[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity

Con Kolivas wrote:

>On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:21, Nick Piggin wrote:
>>No, this still special-cases the uninterruptible sleep. Why is this
>>needed? What is being worked around? There is probably a way to
>>attack the cause of the problem.
>Footnote: I was thinking of using this to also _elevate_ the dynamic priority
>of tasks waking from interruptible sleep as well which may help throughput.

Con, an uninterruptible sleep is one which is not be woken by a signal,
an interruptible sleep is one which is. There is no other connotation.
What happens when read/write syscalls are changed to be interruptible?
I'm not saying this will happen... but come to think of it, NFS probably
has interruptible read/write.

In short: make the same policy for an interruptible and an uninterruptible

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.113 / U:5.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site