Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 31 Aug 2003 11:24:49 -0400 | From | Daniel Jacobowitz <> | Subject | Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? |
| |
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:21:37AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > http://cs.nmu.edu/~benchmark/ has an interesting little graph > of LMBench results vs. Linux kernel version, all done with the > same compiler. > > Has anyone seen a similar graph showing LMBench results vs. gcc version, > all done with the same Linux kernel? > And does everyone agree that's a meaningful way to compare the > performance of code generated by different compilers? > > I happen to have a number of versions of gcc handy, and was > considering making such a graph, but was hoping somebody > else had already done it.
It's been a while since I looked at lmbench but: why do you think this would be useful? It's a system and kernel benchmark; I doubt optimization makes much difference at all.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |