lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: UP optimizations ..
Daniel Egger wrote:
> Shouldn't these be marked const?

1. There's no need, because they are inline and simple enough to optimise.

2. GCC seems to ignore const and pure attributes on inline functions,
even when that would enable optimisation that it cannot see from the
function body.


-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.051 / U:5.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site