[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: IDE wierdness
On 20 Aug 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2003-08-20 at 16:09, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > It's clear to me that I don't want to use this drive but I'm wondering if
> > there is any interest in debugging the lock up. I've only done it on
> > 2.4.18 as shipped by redhat but I could try 2.6 or whatever you like.
> >
> > If the concensus is that it is OK that bad hardware locks you up then I'll
> > toss the drive and move on.
> Some PIO transfers are regulated by the drive and the drive can lock the
> bus forever. Newer chipsets like the SI680/3112 support watchdog
> deadlock breakers for this but we don't really support them right now.
> Getting different data off a failing drive is unusual because the blocks
> are ECC'd extensively (well more than ECC'd) and have checks, could be
> the RAM/CPU going I guess.

Although it can happen. I used to see corrupted data in /etc/motd (which is
rewritten on each boot up) and random SEGVs on an embedded box. A few weeks
later the drive started to report real errors. After mapping out the bad blocks
using e2fsck -c, and replacing the files that were affected, the problem

Looks like ECC is not always ECC...



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.058 / U:2.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site