[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PCI PM & compatibility
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:29, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> I don't understand. We suspend the children before we suspend the device,
> so as long as all the children go done, so will the parent device.

Forget it... It had crap in mind. Anyway, my point was actually the
opposite than what I wrote :( I was really to make sure that if a
device is "held" up by pm_users beeing non-NULL, it's _parents_
(and not it's children, sorry about the confusion), are also held
non-suspended... I think I'll sleep a bit and then just go look at
the code ;)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.048 / U:3.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site