[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] bad definition of cpus_complement
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:54:52AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
> One of the definitions of cpus_complement is broke. Also, cpus_complement is
> the only cpus_* definition which operates in-place rather than in (dst,src)
> form. I will submit a patch to convert if there is interest.

The definition is fine (see other responses), but the inconsistent
argument convention might be worth shoring up to match the others.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.045 / U:4.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site