Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:32:28 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] bad definition of cpus_complement |
| |
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:54:52AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote: > One of the definitions of cpus_complement is broke. Also, cpus_complement is > the only cpus_* definition which operates in-place rather than in (dst,src) > form. I will submit a patch to convert if there is interest.
The definition is fine (see other responses), but the inconsistent argument convention might be worth shoring up to match the others.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |