Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.4: always_inline for gcc3 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 27 Aug 2003 15:37:35 +0100 |
| |
On Maw, 2003-08-26 at 17:24, J.A. Magallon wrote: > gcc3 did not inline big functions, even if they were marked as inline > Thread: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103632325600005&r=1&w=2 > Things like memcpy and copy_to/from_user were affected. > They were not inlined and you got tons of instances in vmlinux.
The more interesting question you want to answer first is - was gcc right. Repeated code is bad for cache
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |