[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: cache limit
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 09:11:17PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> This is moderately misguided; essentially the only way userspace can
>> utilize RAM at all is via the pagecache. It's not useful to limit this;
>> you probably need inode-highmem or some such nonsense.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:58:47PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Exactly. Every program you have opened, and all of its libraries will show
> up as pagecache memory also, so seeing a large pagecache in and of itself
> may not be a problem.
> Let's get past the tuning paramenter you want in /proc, and tell us more
> about what you are doing that is causing this problem to be shown.

One thing I thought of after the post was whether they actually had in
mind tunable hard limits on _unmapped_ pagecache, which is, in fact,
useful. OTOH that's largely speculation and we really need them to
articulate the true nature of their problem.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.118 / U:6.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site