lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Futex non-page-pinning fix
From
Date
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 09:02, Andrew Morton wrote:

> umm, how about hashing only on offset into page? That reduces the number of
> threads which need to be visited in futex_wake() by a factor of up to 1024.

How likely do you consider it that we then get a major collision?
I wouldn't be surprised if, say, glibc lays some hot futexes out in a
way that's the same for all processes in the system, like start of the
page.... Might as well not hash :)

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.134 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site