[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.22-rc2 unresolved symbols in drm/sis.o wh en CONFIG_AGP=m
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 09:12, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> why wont the module compilation still pass
> when SIS fb configuration flags from the
> Linux kernel configuration are missing?
> sorry if that requirement is already
> mentioned in the readme. i am just wondering.

The SiS DRM uses sisfb to allocate the framebuffer memory (XFree86 uses
sisfb, too, when present). There is currently no fallback method for
when sisfb is not present. I am working at the moment on removing this
requirement. We could have ifdeffed appropriately and built a
non-functional module, but that wasn't done.

I hope nobody minds me making massive style changes on the sis DRM
code. I find it quite ugly at the moment.

Eric Anholt

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.029 / U:0.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site