[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjecttasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP
While going thru the code for tasklet_kill(), I cannot figure out
how recursive tasklets (tasklets that schedule themselves from within
their tasklet handler) can be killed by this function. To me it looks that
tasklet_kill will never complete for such tasklets.

void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));

The above while loop will only exit if TASKLET_STATE_SCHED is not set
(tasklet is not scheduled).
Now if we see tasklet_action

static void tasklet_action(struct softirq_action *a)
if (!atomic_read(&t->count)) {
--> TASKLET_STATE_SCHED is set here
if(!test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
--> if we schedule the tasklet inside its handler,
--> TASKLET_STATE_SCHED will be set here also

The only small window when TASKLET_STATE_SCHED is not set is between the
time when test_and_clear_bit above clears it and by the time the tasklet
handler again calls tasklet_schedule(). But since tasklet_kill is called
from user context the while loop in tasklet_kill checking for
TASKLET_STATE_SCHED to be cleared cannot interleave between the above two
lines in tasklet_action and hence tasklet_kill will never come out of the
while loop.
This is true only for UP machines.

Pleae point me out if I am missing something.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.131 / U:5.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site