[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy
> Hi,
> Patch against 2.6.0-test4. It fixes a lot of problems here vs
> previous versions. There aren't really any open issues for me, so
> testers would be welcome.
> On the other hand, I expect the best cases and maybe most usual cases would
> be better on Con's... and Con might have since done some work in the latency
> area.

Has anyone developed a (run-time) scheduler [policy] selector, via
sysctl or sysfs, so that different kernel builds aren't required?

I know that I have heard discussions of this previously.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.123 / U:3.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site