[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy
    > Hi,
    > Patch against 2.6.0-test4. It fixes a lot of problems here vs
    > previous versions. There aren't really any open issues for me, so
    > testers would be welcome.
    > On the other hand, I expect the best cases and maybe most usual cases would
    > be better on Con's... and Con might have since done some work in the latency
    > area.

    Has anyone developed a (run-time) scheduler [policy] selector, via
    sysctl or sysfs, so that different kernel builds aren't required?

    I know that I have heard discussions of this previously.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.019 / U:50.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site