lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix loose->lose typos in 2.6.0-test2
Date
In message <20030815121240.7ff9fed0.rddunlap@osdl.org> you write:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 03:12:52 +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> | After a brief conversation with Andrew, Trivial Patch Monkey is only
> | taking patches for documentation and where grep might be effected.
> | Feel free to push this directly though.
>
> then it qualifies.
> Who would grep for 'loose' when it should be 'lose' and v.v.?

I was thinking of something like a variable name, (eg. foo_close was
misspellt as foo_klose) then someone might be greping for "close"
functions and miss it.

Or if the documentation for the foo card talked about the "Dunlap
Enable" feature, and it was misspellt "Donlap" in the code or
comments, it'd be nice to be fixed.

But the lose/loose one is a stretch, I think.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.043 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site