lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Race condition in 2.4 tasklet handling (cli() broken?)
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 05:56:04PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 00:13:15 +0900
> TeJun Huh <tejun@aratech.co.kr> wrote:
>
> > Hello, Stephan.
> >
> > The race conditions I'm mentioning in this thread are not likely to
> > cause real troubles. The first one does not make any difference on
> > x86, and AFAIK bh isn't used extensively anymore so the second one
> > isn't very relevant either. Only the race condition mentioned in the
> > other thread is of relvance if there is any :-(.
>
> Are you sure? bh is used in fs subtree to my knowledge ...
>

Wow, I'm not sure. Because our application is mostly concerned with
network and raw DISK I/O, I haven't been paying attention to fs codes.
If bh can be problematic, I'll try to rethink about the bh
synchronization and make a patch tomorrow, probably another one or two
liner. First thing tomorrow.

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.089 / U:7.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site