Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:56:23 +0200 | From | Wiktor Wodecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]O18int |
| |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:51:16PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Friday 22 August 2003 23:41, Wiktor Wodecki wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:31:20PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Content-Description: clearsigned data > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Here is a small patchlet. > > > > > > It is possible tasks were getting more sleep_avg credit on requeuing than > > > they could burn off while running so I've removed the on runqueue bonus > > > to requeuing task. > > > > > > Note this applies onto O16.3 or 2.6.0-test3-mm3 as O17 was dropped. > > > > > > This patch is also available here along with a patch against 2.6.0-test3: > > > http://kernel.kolivas.org/2.5 > > > > > > Con > > > > this patch still makes my xmms skip on light io load (untar kernel > > source, open lkml mailbox folder) while opening mozilla. Even after > > mozilla is there xmms is still skipping. Processes take ages to spawn. > > And no, I'm not in swap. A 'su -'is taking 10 seconds to procceed. > > Same applies when rm -Rf'ing a kernel tree. > > Here is some more data for the curious: > > > note the load of 11. I can even get it to 30 while doing 3 tar xf > > bla.tar simultanously. > > Complete mystery. > > > > I'm going to fetch some fish in the next two weeks in poland, so I will > > not be able to do any more testing from sunday on. Happy coding (while I > > stick to O10 *g*) > > Thanks for comments. ] > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question before your > holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a different/newere > one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know but I need to know; this > just doesn't hold with any testing here.
well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from test3 I didn't rediff it.
-- Regards,
Wiktor Wodecki [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |