[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy
    On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:53:01 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > I haven't run many tests on it - my mind blanked when I tried to
    > remember the scores of scheduler "exploits" thrown around. So if
    > anyone would like to suggest some, or better still, run some,
    > please do so. And be nice, this isn't my type of scheduler :P

    I timed a pathological benchmark from hell I've been playing with lately.
    Three consecutive runs following a fresh boot. Time is in seconds:

    2.4.21 821 21 25
    2.6.0-test3-mm1 724 946 896
    2.6.0-test3-mm1-nick 905 987 997

    Runtime with ideal scheduling: < 2 seconds (we're thrashing).

    If anybody has thrashing test cases closer to the real world, I'd be very
    interested to learn about them.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.060 / U:68.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site