[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]O18int
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:03:19AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question before
> > > your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a
> > > different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know but
> > > I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here.
> >
> > well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from
> > test3 I didn't rediff it.
> So O18 is also on test2?

Okay, I applied O18 on top of test2 now. Xmms works as a charm,
programm start is still slow while doing an tar xf linuxtest2.tar.
Already open xterm's (one with mutt) react a bit in-interactive (I spawn
vi to write this email and a :w takes 5 seconds). It is nonetheless
worse than O10, sorry to say that.


Wiktor Wodecki
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.104 / U:1.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site