Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]O18int | Date | Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:54:36 +1000 |
| |
On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:46, Wiktor Wodecki wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:03:19AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question > > > > before your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a > > > > different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know > > > > but I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here. > > > > > > well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from > > > test3 I didn't rediff it. > > > > So O18 is also on test2? > > Okay, I applied O18 on top of test2 now. Xmms works as a charm, > programm start is still slow while doing an tar xf linuxtest2.tar. > Already open xterm's (one with mutt) react a bit in-interactive (I spawn > vi to write this email and a :w takes 5 seconds). It is nonetheless > worse than O10, sorry to say that.
Ok, but none of that weird starvation and massive load and skipping audio. Interesting. At least it's clear now that all is _not_ just my patches. Thanks for testing.
Con
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |