[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]O18int
On Saturday 23 August 2003 01:46, Wiktor Wodecki wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:03:19AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > There it is again; the reference to darn O10. Hrm. One question
> > > > before your holiday; your O10 kernel is it the same kernel tree or a
> > > > different/newere one? I'm looking to blame something else here I know
> > > > but I need to know; this just doesn't hold with any testing here.
> > >
> > > well, I run O10 on top of test2, since I didn't need any patches from
> > > test3 I didn't rediff it.
> >
> > So O18 is also on test2?
> Okay, I applied O18 on top of test2 now. Xmms works as a charm,
> programm start is still slow while doing an tar xf linuxtest2.tar.
> Already open xterm's (one with mutt) react a bit in-interactive (I spawn
> vi to write this email and a :w takes 5 seconds). It is nonetheless
> worse than O10, sorry to say that.

Ok, but none of that weird starvation and massive load and skipping audio.
Interesting. At least it's clear now that all is _not_ just my patches.
Thanks for testing.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.048 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site