lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH][2.6][5/5]Support for HPET based timer
Date
From



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vojtech Pavlik [mailto:vojtech@suse.cz]
> Indeed. The main problem, however, for me was to decide which
> IRQ to use
> for the HPET. The HPET has a big mask of allowable IRQs, the APIC has
> many pins - so how to decide which one to use and if possible
> not share
> it with a PCI device?

This possibly can be done by selecting the pin that is not already
programmed by
setup_IO_APIC_irqs(), and do a manual setup_IO_APIC_irqs() on that, for
HPET
usage.

> That'd work probably. I don't believe there will ever be systems with
> HPET and without a working IOAPIC. But, well, insane things do happen.
>
> As for the user disabling it, we could disable HPET then,
> too. Anyway, I
> agree with your proposal of first going for legacy mode and
> doing native
> mode later.

Thanks for all the comments/suggestions. I will work on using early
ioremap in
place of fixmap and resend the patch.

> (PS. It's a pretty stupid thing in the HPET spec to only be able to
> gobble up BOTH the PIT and RTC interrupts and not separately.)

I totally agree with you. Just one additional bit would have solved the
these problems. Also, I do not understand why RTC interrupts were
overridden
at all, when HPET cannot provide complete RTC functionality and it does
not
know anything about RTC time.


Thanks,
-Venkatesh



> --
> Vojtech Pavlik
> SuSE Labs, SuSE CR
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.030 / U:1.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site