[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: cache limit
"J.A. Magallon" <> wrote:
> > It was not. Instead we have fadvise. So it would be appropriate to change
> Does this work in 2.4 ?
> If not, any patch flying around ?

No. It would be fairly messy to implement in 2.4 because 2.4 does not have
the per-inode radix trees for pagecache. The implementation would need to
walk every page attached to the inode just to shoot down a single page.
And all of it underneath the global pagecache lock.

But it is certainly possible.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.119 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site