[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Will uclibc be supported in 2.6? (was Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] scsi.h uses "u8" which isn't defined.)
Rob Landley wrote:
> I'm all for doing it in 2.7. I just want to know what I should do for 2.6.
> If there's a consensus that we're talking about 2.7 and allowing ad-hockery
> to continue in 2.6, I'll shut up. :)

That's always been the consensus :)

2.6 is long past the point for major header surgery and breakage.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.064 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site