[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:34:06PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> >You forgot to mention fork() splitting its timeslice 2/3 to 1/3 parent
> >to child.
> >
> >
> Hmm... did I do that? I don't actually have the code in front of me, but I
> think the timeslice split is still 50/50 (see fork.c). Its the priority
> points that go 2/3 to 1/3. Actually its a bit more complex than that even
> and probably not exactly right...

Actually, it's as you say. The terms sleeptime and timeslice just
confused me.

Matt Mackall : : of or relating to the moon
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.044 / U:2.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site