Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:12:31 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged |
| |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:50:49PM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote: >> ..So not *all* such cases are cause for alarm. However, if you run one of >> the patches enabling logging of this, you quickly learn what's normal for >> the apps you run, and can teach your log-auditing tools and/or your brain >> to ignore them.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:02:38PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that > is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the origional > poster wants logged...
They're almost all sent by the kernel. Very few represent kill(1).
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |