[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:50:49PM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote:
>> ..So not *all* such cases are cause for alarm. However, if you run one of
>> the patches enabling logging of this, you quickly learn what's normal for
>> the apps you run, and can teach your log-auditing tools and/or your brain
>> to ignore them.

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 02:02:38PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that
> is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the origional
> poster wants logged...

They're almost all sent by the kernel. Very few represent kill(1).

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.143 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site