[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:50:49PM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote:
> ..So not *all* such cases are cause for alarm. However, if you run one of
> the patches enabling logging of this, you quickly learn what's normal for
> the apps you run, and can teach your log-auditing tools and/or your brain
> to ignore them.

And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that
is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the origional
poster wants logged...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.084 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site