lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] O16int for interactivity


    Nick Piggin wrote:

    >> If another task exists at a higher priority, then it gets run at
    >> that point.
    >
    >
    >
    > Well loosely, yes. Actually, it happens if the task exists and is
    > "running",
    > and has timeslice left.

    > That only happens in scheduler_tick when the
    > current
    > task has finished its timeslice and the priority arrays are about to be
    > switched.

    What only happens then?

    I'm confused again. Are you talking about swapping the active and
    expired arrays?

    Of course, all bets are off if the current task actually uses up it
    whole timeslice. Then it's not being preempted in quite the same way.

    So, then, if there are not tasks left in the active array, naturally,
    the highest priority task from what was once the expired array will be
    run, and that may be of higher priority.

    Is that what you're saying?


    > The required conditions for preemption can also occur when a task
    > is being woken up, (after sleeping or newly forked).

    This is the case that I was thinking of. No swapping of queues. It's
    just that a higher priority task was sleeping (or not existing) which
    could cause the current task to be preempted before its timeslice ends.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.022 / U:0.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site