lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask
From
Date
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:

> > No. The documentation states that consistent_dma_mask (and not dma_mask)
> > will be used when doing pci_alloc_consistent().
>
> Then the platforms need to implement the code.

There is no problem with that, i.e. the changes are trivial (except
for pci_map_*, but that's another story).

I don't know if it wouldn't break something, though. x86-64 and ia64
are much less tested than i386 and the change would alter i386
behaviour to that of x86-64/ia64.

Again: which driver uses the consistent_dma_mask and where I can find it?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.085 / U:2.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site