[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] use simple_strtoul for unsigned kernel parameters
In message <> you write:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > In message <> you write:
> > > The largest "unsigned int" value doesn't fit in a "long", on many machines.
> > > So we should use simple_strtoul, not simple_strtol, to decode these values.
> >
> > Half right. The second part is fine, the first part is redundant
> Do you mean the first part of the comment or the first part of the patch?
> Assuming you mean the patch, you're right: the unsigned short case
> doesn't need to be changed. It should be anyway because it is just
> the right thing to do.

<shrug>. Linus took the patch. If you think it's the Right Thing,

Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.114 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site