[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: scsi proc_info called unconditionally
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> It probably should give the driver name and version. Christoph is
> right in the longer term but in the real world people still expect
> /proc/scsi/* to contain at least that info.

/proc/scsi/* is not standardized so even if you add a name no
userspace tool can sanely parse it without knowing all drivers.
sysfs OTOH can do this sanely.

So, no it does not make sense to add anything here for a 2.6 driver.

> Possibly for 2.7.x /proc/scsi/* should become an fs or entirely sysfs

/proc/scsi/ will be optional and marked deprecated with with one of my
next patches and go away in 2.9.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.053 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site