lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Scheduler activations (IIRC) question
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 09:02:53PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Vectorizing doesn't help. In the example of 5 stat() calls, those
> calls could easily be due to 5 different service state machines, each
> responding to a different user request. There's no easy way to work
> out that they could have been submitted as a single vector.

Well, it's pretty much orthogonal to "making everything async", but it
does have the advantage of batching and hence reducing the number of
system call traps that need to be made to get a given amount of work
done. It's unfortunate there aren't more users of the vectored API's.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.103 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site