[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> > d) not disable preemption for long stretches while hashing (a
> > limitation of cryptoapi)
> Sounds like a bug in CryptoAPI that should be fixed in CryptoAPI.

This is for the case of hashing from a per cpu context, which is an
inherently unsafe context for introducing schedule points. This is not
a crypto API specific problem.

- James
James Morris

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.215 / U:8.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site