[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?
    On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

    > > d) not disable preemption for long stretches while hashing (a
    > > limitation of cryptoapi)
    > Sounds like a bug in CryptoAPI that should be fixed in CryptoAPI.

    This is for the case of hashing from a per cpu context, which is an
    inherently unsafe context for introducing schedule points. This is not
    a crypto API specific problem.

    - James
    James Morris

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.019 / U:2.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site