[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Dri-devel] Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport
Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
>>On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
>>>Indeed I have. And there is a reason that we have a policy at BitMover
>>>where "formatting changes" are prohibited and we make people redo their
>>>changesets until they get them right.
>>>In other words, you are welcome to write a revision control system
>>>which can look through the formatting changes and give you the semantic
>>>knowledge that you want. We'd love to see how it is done and then do
>>>it in BitKeeper :)
>>You should allow for ...
> Didn't you mean "in the SCM system I'm writing, I allow for ..."?
> Besides, your point is content specific. People check things other than
> C code into BK.

I assume you can have content-specific validators run before a commit?
(CVS can.) A validator could see that it was formatting only and mark it
in someway perhaps?
But we've wandered _way_ OT at this point, and it's well past the point
of diminishing returns...

--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
eli.carter(a) `-------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.051 / U:1.512 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site