Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH] sched_best_cpu | From | Frank Cornelis <> | Date | 13 Aug 2003 15:00:08 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
I ran across the '10 *' stuff (grrr... grrr...) in linux-2.6.0-test3/kernel/sched.c:sched_best_cpu I think next patch is more like it.
Frank.
--- sched.c.orig 2003-08-09 06:39:35.000000000 +0200 +++ sched.c 2003-08-13 14:55:05.000000000 +0200 @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ */ static int sched_best_cpu(struct task_struct *p) { - int i, minload, load, best_cpu, node = 0; + int i, minload, load, best_cpu, node = 0, pnode; unsigned long cpumask; best_cpu = task_cpu(p); @@ -784,14 +784,14 @@ return best_cpu; minload = 10000000; + pnode = cpu_to_node(task_cpu(p)); for_each_node_with_cpus(i) { /* * Node load is always divided by nr_cpus_node to normalise * load values in case cpu count differs from node to node. - * We first multiply node_nr_running by 10 to get a little - * better resolution. + * If the node != our node we add the load of the task. */ - load = 10 * atomic_read(&node_nr_running[i]) / nr_cpus_node(i); + load = (atomic_read(&node_nr_running[i]) + (i != pnode)) / nr_cpus_node(i); if (load < minload) { minload = load; node = i; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |