[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]O14int
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 03:56, Simon Kirby wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 07:06:34PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Is this with or without my changes? The old scheduler was not very
> > scalable; that's why we moved. The new one has other intrinsic issues
> > that I (and others) have been trying to address, but is much much more
> > scalable. It was not possible to make the old one more scalable, but it
> > is possible to make this one more interactive.
> Without your changes. Are you changing the design or just tuning certain
> cases? I was talking more about the theory behind the scheduling
> decisions and not about particular cases.

I'm just changing the algorithm that gives priority boost or penalty, and
creating code to further feedback into that algorithm.

> The O(1) scheduler changes definitely help scalability and I don't have
> any problem with that change (unless it introduced the behavior I'm
> talking about).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.067 / U:2.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site