lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:42:16AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> At 05:18 PM 8/12/2003 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> >And no, X isn't intentionally sleeping. Its being preempted which is
> >obviously not intentional.
>
> Right. Every time X wakes the gl thread, he'll lose the cpu. Once the gl
> thread passes X in priority, X is pretty much doomed. (hmm... sane [hard]
> backboost will probably prevent that)

Isn't 2.4 doing exactly that for pipes and such?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.169 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site