[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Updated MSI Patches
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> So, IMO, do_IRQ is one special case where copying code may be preferred
> over common code.
> And I also feel the same way about do_MSI(). However, I have not looked
> at non-ia32 MSI implementations to know what sort of issues exist.

The main reason i have a preference for a seperate MSI handling path is so
that we don't have to do the platform_irq thing in do_IRQ and we know
what to expect wrt irq or vector. If platform_irq stays we should at
least try and pick up on what the IA64 folks have done, But that would be
even harder to get done right now.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.067 / U:6.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site