lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH]O14int
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 07:06:34PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Is this with or without my changes? The old scheduler was not very scalable;
> that's why we moved. The new one has other intrinsic issues that I (and
> others) have been trying to address, but is much much more scalable. It was
> not possible to make the old one more scalable, but it is possible to make
> this one more interactive.

Without your changes. Are you changing the design or just tuning certain
cases? I was talking more about the theory behind the scheduling
decisions and not about particular cases.

The O(1) scheduler changes definitely help scalability and I don't have
any problem with that change (unless it introduced the behavior I'm
talking about).

Simon-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.150 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site