[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]O14int

Con Kolivas wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:44, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
>>On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 11:04, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 01:49, Con Kolivas wrote:
>>>>More duck tape interactivity tweaks
>>>>Wli pointed out an error in the nanosecond to jiffy conversion which
>>>>may have been causing too easy to migrate tasks on smp (? performance
>>>Looks like I broke SMP build with this. Will fix soon; don't bother
>>>trying this on SMP yet.
>>Not to be nasty or such, but all these patches have taken
>>a very responsive HT box to one that have issues with multiple
>>make -j10's running and random jerkyness.
>A UP HT box you mean? That shouldn't be capable of running multiple make -j10s
>without some noticable effect. Apart from looking impressive, there is no
>point in having 30 cpu heavy things running with only 1 and a bit processor
>and the machine being smooth as silk; the cpu heavy things will just be
>unfairly starved in the interest of appearance (I can do that easily enough).
>Please give details if there is a specific issue you think I've broken or
>else I wont know about it.

Yeah make -j10s won't be without impact, but I think for a lot of
interactive stuff they don't need a lot of CPU, just to get it
in a timely manner. And Martin did say it had been responsive.
Sounds like in this case your changes are causing the interactive
stuff to get less CPU or higher scheduling latency?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.154 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site