[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: C99 Initialisers
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 19:02, CaT wrote:
> Is there any interest ins omeone 'fixing up' as many structs in the
> kernel from the form:

Yes, indeed, especially for 2.6. There has been a lot of work already in
this direction -- not too much should be left.

> And if so, what form should I feed it back in? Big patches? 1 patch
> per file? 1 per dir?

Whatever makes most sense. One per directory is probably OK for most

> Main reaosn I'm asking is that it's slowly being done but isn't in
> the janitor list of things to do yet. If it were I'd just do it. ;)

It should be in the list.

Convert GNU-style to C99-style. I think converting unnamed initializers
to named initializers is a Good Thing, too.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.066 / U:0.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site