[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR starve-free linux scheduling policy ...
At 09:28 PM 8/10/2003 +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:

>there's a cap on that. And anyway, why aren't those kernel threads running
>with realtime priority in the first place?

Good question. events, kblockd and aio at least look like they should.

>While we're in here: what should be the maximum realtime priority granted
>to a
>normal user? It should probably be another adminstrator knob.

That's an easy one.. the top of the SCHED_SOFTRR range ;)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.098 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site