[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O12.2int for interactivity
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 18:49, Timothy Miller wrote:

> Or closer to the point:
> "For each record player, there is a record which it cannot play."
> For more detail, please read this dialog:
> The interactivity detection algorithm will always be inherently
> imperfect. Given that it is not psychic, it cannot tell in advance
> whether or not a given process is supposed to be interactive, so it must
> GUESS based on its behavior.

Another way of looking at it is that every time you remove a bottleneck, the
next most serious problem becomes the new bottleneck.

Does this mean it's a bad idea to stop trying to identify the next bottleneck?
(Whether or not you then choose to deal with it is another question...)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.106 / U:1.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site