[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()
On 31 July 2003 18:07, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko <> writes:
> > Yes, but some future version would.
> >
> > Since there is no substantial wins in hunting down
> > such statics, and there is some risk of code bloat when
> > big inlined statics get called from more that one callsite,
> > and it will be automatically handled by smarter compiler someday,
> > I think it makes perfect sense to avoid doing this.
> Could you tell me, if compiler does it in future? I'll gladly kill
> that inline.

I can't be 100.00% sure it will happen. I'd say 98.234235% ;)

Andrew Morton kills extra large inlines, and you are creating them :(
That's not ok. Just leave those poor static functions alone
until compiler will do them, all at once.
There are lots of other stuff to do in the kernel source.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.123 / U:1.992 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site