Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jul 2003 02:48:11 -0400 (EDT) | From | Zwane Mwaikambo <> | Subject | Re: printk in atomic context |
| |
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, [koi8-r] "Andrey Borzenkov[koi8-r] " wrote:
> > Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under > spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region? > > The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?)
Yes you can, it's rather robust.
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |