lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: printk in atomic context
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, [koi8-r] "Andrey Borzenkov[koi8-r] "  wrote:

>
> Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under
> spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region?
>
> The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?)

Yes you can, it's rather robust.

--
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.468 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site