lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity
Date
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:36, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Oh, and the process scheduler can definitely be a contributing factor.
> Even if it looks like your process is getting enough cpu, if your
> process doesn't get woken in less than 5ms after its read completes,
> then AS will give up waiting for it.

This part interests me. It would seem that either
1. The AS scheduler should not bother waiting at all if the process is not
going to wake up in that time
2. The process should be woken in that time to ensure the AS scheduler is not
wasting it's time waiting.
or a combination of 1 and 2 depending on some heuristic deciding on how
important it is for 2 instead of 1.

No, I'm not planning on trying to implement either of these <insert usual
complaint about time and knowledge here>, but I thought I should at least
contribute my thoughts.

Con

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.106 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site