[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] scheduler fix for 1cpu/node case
> On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:05, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> you're using node_to_cpu_mask for ia64 ... others were using
>> node_to_cpumask (1 less "_"), so this doesn't build ...
> Ooops, you're right, of course. Sorry about this mistake :-(

np - was easy to fix up ;-) I did run some benchmarks on it ...
low end SDET seemed highly variable, but otherwise looked OK.
If I have only 4 tasks running on a 16x (4x4), what's the rate
limit on the idle cpus trying to steal now?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.068 / U:2.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site