[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[OT] Re: [PATCH] protect migration/%d etc from sched_setaffinity

On 08.01, Robert Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 16:06, Joe Korty wrote:
> > It's not all system daemons, just some of them that need protection.
> >
> > Keeping the set of locked-down daemons to the smallest possible is
> > important when one wants to 'set aside' cpus for use only by
> > specific, need-the-lowest-latency-possible realtime applications.
> Yah, I know. But this is a lot of code just to prevent root from hanging
> herself, and she has plenty of other ways with which to do that.

Er, why 'she' ?
In spanish we use root==admin as male, and root==tree or plant root,
as female.

Any pointer (like those of jargon dictionaries) ?

TIA ;)

J.A. Magallon <> \ Software is like
sex: \ It's better when it's
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.22-pre9-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.7mdk))
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.063 / U:2.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site