[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:37, David Brownell wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I
> >>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on
> >>seems like it needs polishing yet! :)
> >
> >
> > Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM.
> USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they
> won't notice missing features there. Regressions
> are a different story though.
> But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?)
> might want to veto suspending devices that are being
> used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist.

The only place where a kernel driver may veto is when doing things
like firmware flashing.

If you want to veto suspend when burning a CD, it's userland policy. We
still need, I beleive, to define/write a proper userland-side API for
all these with the daemon that goes with it. That will be next step once
we have the kernel side working properly ;)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.985 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site