[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume
    On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 15:37, David Brownell wrote:
    > Pavel Machek wrote:
    > >>All of which is a roundabout way of adding to what I
    > >>said: the PM infrastructure USB will need to rely on
    > >>seems like it needs polishing yet! :)
    > >
    > >
    > > Do you need vetoing? Otherwise it should be ready, except for APM.
    > USB drivers don't talk suspend/resume yet, so they
    > won't notice missing features there. Regressions
    > are a different story though.
    > But I can imagine that usb-storage (or is that SCSI?)
    > might want to veto suspending devices that are being
    > used for some kinds of i/o. Eventually it should exist.

    The only place where a kernel driver may veto is when doing things
    like firmware flashing.

    If you want to veto suspend when burning a CD, it's userland policy. We
    still need, I beleive, to define/write a proper userland-side API for
    all these with the daemon that goes with it. That will be next step once
    we have the kernel side working properly ;)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.019 / U:198.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site