[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] O11int for interactivity
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 10:29, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:

Hi Felipe,

> I'm running 2.6.0-test2-mm1 + O11int.patch + O11.1int.patch and I must
> say this is getting damn good! In the past, I've had to tweak scheduler
> knobs to tune the engine to my taste, but since O10, this is a thing of
> the past. It's working as smooth as silk...
> Good work!
I really really wonder why I don't experience this behaviour. For me, the best
scheduler patch in the past was the one from you. I had a test last night
with 011.1 and I rebooted into 2.4 back after some hours of testing because
it is unusable for me under load, and it is no heavy load, it's just for
example a simple "make -j2 bzImage modules".

What makes me even more wondering is that 2.6.0-test1-wli tree does not suck
at all for interactivity where no scheduler changes were made.

Maybe we need both: VM fixups (we need them anyway!) and O(1) fixups so that
also my machine will be happy ;)

ciao, Marc

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.157 / U:3.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site