lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Disk performance degradation
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Lou Langholtz wrote:

> Anyone want to field why we aren't we just setting the default to 512 so
> users don't need to adjust this? I'm sure there's a good reason... I'd
> just like to know what it is ;-)

mike:~# hdparm -a 512 /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
setting fs readahead to 512
BLKRASET failed: Invalid argument
readahead = 8 (on)

mike:~# hdparm -a 255 /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
setting fs readahead to 255
readahead = 255 (on)

mike:~# hdparm -a 256 /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
setting fs readahead to 256
BLKRASET failed: Invalid argument
readahead = 255 (on)

Probably for reasons like that. For some reason, I can't set my ICH4
based controller(ASUS P4B533) and Quantum Fireball AS40.0 to more than
255. Kernel is 2.4.21

Or I'm missing more of this thread than I thought and I'm completely off
topic here!

(i'm guessing the latter)

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.131 / U:2.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site