[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Feature proposal (scheduling related) -- conclusion

> > great, I had no idea of this potential. But what I propose is scheduling the
> > network traffic (at least the outgoing traffic that we can influence directly)
> > according to the process priority, not according to the traffic type (which is
> > important but different).
> So you want to use a number that controls the CPU scheduling to force the network
> scheduling to go along? That's a bad idea waiting to happen.

Hint: he's right.

By default it is reasonable to give lower disk priority to nice -19 tasks. In some cases that
breaks, so cpu_nice, disk_nice etc. would be better.
Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.089 / U:1.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site