[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: What to expect with the 2.6 VM
    On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:54:31AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >> I call that application #2.

    On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 09:33:28PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > maybe I'm missing something but protections have nothing to do with
    > remap_file_pages IMHO. That's all about teaching the swap code to
    > reserve more bits in the swap entry and to store the protections there
    > and possibly teaching the page fault not to get confused. It might
    > prefer to use the populate callback too to avoid specializing the
    > pte_none case, but I think the syscall should be different, and it
    > shouldn't have anything to do with the nonlinearity (nor with rmap).

    It's obvious what to do about protections.

    -- wli
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.030 / U:20.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site